Court Summary - at a glance
Date of offence:
6 June 2017
Plea:
Guilty
Decision:
Convicted
Final decision date:
Fine imposed:
$60,000
Safety lessons learned:
- Assess whether the PCBU is competent and capable of designing and manufacturing the plant according to industry standards;
- Ensure the PCBU has acquired all relevant information about the safety requirements for manufacturing a firewood processor log splitter;
- Ensure the plant meets all relevant safety requirements;
- Ensure the PCBU follows the advice of other experts it has engaged in the field when manufacturing plant;
- Ensure the PCBU gives adequate information, including but not limited to, an operating manual and maintenance information, and results from any tests undertaken on the plant.
Defendant name:
MMD Engineering Limited
Industry:
Manufacturing
Date of offence:
6 June 2017
Facts in brief:
MMD was approached by Davies to design and build a firewood processor/log splitter. MMD had not designed such a machine before and took on the project. Davies had failed to carry out appropriate enquiries into whether MMD was capable of designing and manufacturing such a machine.
MMD engaged certain key suppliers and consulted some guidance, but failed to consider a key relevant safety standard. It was delivered without an instruction manual, no commissioning report or safety audit had been done, and the machine lacked an interlocking guard. The machine was not designed and manufactured according to industry standards.
Once on site, Davies removed the guard because of issues with vibration. It did not ensure there was a risk management system, or safe system for clearing blockages.
A worker was operating the machine and his fingers were trapped between the hydraulic ram and the saw blade, causing four fingers to be amputated below the knuckle. Three were able to be reattached.
MMD engaged certain key suppliers and consulted some guidance, but failed to consider a key relevant safety standard. It was delivered without an instruction manual, no commissioning report or safety audit had been done, and the machine lacked an interlocking guard. The machine was not designed and manufactured according to industry standards.
Once on site, Davies removed the guard because of issues with vibration. It did not ensure there was a risk management system, or safe system for clearing blockages.
A worker was operating the machine and his fingers were trapped between the hydraulic ram and the saw blade, causing four fingers to be amputated below the knuckle. Three were able to be reattached.
Related prosecutions:
Offence section:
Sections 40(1)(a), 40(2)(a), 48(1) and 48(2)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015
Date(s) charged:
Court:
Christchurch - District Court
Plea:
Guilty
Final decision date:
Decision:
Convicted
Fine imposed:
$60,000
Maximum fine available:
$1.5 million
Reparation:
$35,000 to be paid by the co-defendant
Last updated